|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
08/11/2018 |
Actualizado : |
08/11/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
Autor : |
ANTUNES, G.; SILVEIRA, C.S.; MACÍAS-RIOSECO, M.; MORALES-PIÑEYRUA, J.; GIANNITTI, F. |
Afiliación : |
GUSTAVO ANTUNES GASTAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAROLINE DA SILVA SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MELISSA MACÍAS RIOSECO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JESSICA TATIANA MORALES PIÑEYRUA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO GIANNITTI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
¿Es posible mejorar la eficiencia reproductiva? ¿Por dónde empezar?: parada reproducción. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria). Jornada de Porteras Abiertas en Lechería : un pie en el hoy y otro en el futuro. La Estanzuela, Colonia del Sacramento: INIA, octubre 2018. |
Páginas : |
p. 14-16. |
Serie : |
(Serie Actividades de Difusión; 785). |
ISSN : |
1688-8258 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Thesagro : |
EFICIENCIA REPRODUCTIVA. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/11885/1/sad-lecheria-785-.p.14-16.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00805naa a2200205 a 4500 001 1059285 005 2018-11-08 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1688-8258 100 1 $aANTUNES, G. 245 $a¿Es posible mejorar la eficiencia reproductiva? ¿Por dónde empezar?$bparada reproducción.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 300 $ap. 14-16. 490 $a(Serie Actividades de Difusión; 785). 650 $aEFICIENCIA REPRODUCTIVA 700 1 $aSILVEIRA, C.S. 700 1 $aMACÍAS-RIOSECO, M. 700 1 $aMORALES-PIÑEYRUA, J. 700 1 $aGIANNITTI, F. 773 $tIn: INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria). Jornada de Porteras Abiertas en Lechería : un pie en el hoy y otro en el futuro. La Estanzuela, Colonia del Sacramento: INIA, octubre 2018.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
25/04/2022 |
Actualizado : |
25/04/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
KNIGHT, A. L.; PRETI, M.; BASOALTO, E.; MUJICA, V.; FAVARO, R.; ANGELI, S. |
Afiliación : |
ALAN LEE KNIGHT, Instar Biologicals, Yakima, WA, United States; MICHELE PRETI, Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy; ESTEBAN BASOALTO, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Alimentarias; Instituto de Producción y Sanidad Vegetal, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chil; MARIA VALENTINA MUJICA TELIZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; RICCARDO FAVARO, Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy; SERGIO ANGELI, Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy. |
Título : |
Combining female removal with mating disruption for management of Cydia pomonella in apple. [Original paper]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Entomologia Generalis, 2022, Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 309-321. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2021/1316 |
ISSN : |
0171-8177 |
DOI : |
10.1127/entomologia/2021/1316 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Manuscript received 18 February 2021; Revisions requested 2 May 2021; Modified version received 30 May 2021; Accepted 30 July 2021; Published online 4 October 2021; Published Mar 15, 2022.
Corresponding author: Angeli, S.; Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy; email:sergio.angeli@unibz.it -- |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Field studies tested the use of lure-baited traps for female removal (FR) of codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen, treated with sex pheromone-based mating disruption (MD-FR). Four lures were evaluated, including the combination of (E,Z)?2,4?ethyl decadienoate (pear ester, PE), (E)?4,8?dimethyl?1,3,7?nonatriene (DMNT), and 6-ethenyl-2,2,6-trimethyloxan-3-ol (pyranoid linalool oxide, LOX), these three components with (E,E)?8,10?dodecadien?1?ol (PH), and two lures loaded with PH/PE. All lures were used with a co-lure loaded with acetic acid (AA). Studies examined the importance of trap type and density on moth catches. Seventeen trials were conducted in 1-3 ha adjacent paired plots treated with or without 60 traps ha-1 in Washington State from 2018-2020. Paired plots were each treated with MD and a similar spray regime. The mating status of females in the MD-FR plots were compared with females collected from blocks not treated with MD. The PE/DMNT/LOX + AA lure caught significantly more females than any other lure. The most effective trap was a bucket trap with a green top and a clear bottom. Total or female moth catches per trap did not decline across trap densities from 37 to 99 ha-1. MD-FR trials showed that levels of fruit injury could be significantly reduced 50?75% across each moth flight. The proportion of mated females was 8 to 19% lower in blocks treated with MD-FR than not treated with MD. Further studies are needed to refine key operational factors associated with MD-FR considering the economics of organic and conventional apple production across key varieties. © 2021 The authors. MenosABSTRACT.- Field studies tested the use of lure-baited traps for female removal (FR) of codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen, treated with sex pheromone-based mating disruption (MD-FR). Four lures were evaluated, including the combination of (E,Z)?2,4?ethyl decadienoate (pear ester, PE), (E)?4,8?dimethyl?1,3,7?nonatriene (DMNT), and 6-ethenyl-2,2,6-trimethyloxan-3-ol (pyranoid linalool oxide, LOX), these three components with (E,E)?8,10?dodecadien?1?ol (PH), and two lures loaded with PH/PE. All lures were used with a co-lure loaded with acetic acid (AA). Studies examined the importance of trap type and density on moth catches. Seventeen trials were conducted in 1-3 ha adjacent paired plots treated with or without 60 traps ha-1 in Washington State from 2018-2020. Paired plots were each treated with MD and a similar spray regime. The mating status of females in the MD-FR plots were compared with females collected from blocks not treated with MD. The PE/DMNT/LOX + AA lure caught significantly more females than any other lure. The most effective trap was a bucket trap with a green top and a clear bottom. Total or female moth catches per trap did not decline across trap densities from 37 to 99 ha-1. MD-FR trials showed that levels of fruit injury could be significantly reduced 50?75% across each moth flight. The proportion of mated females was 8 to 19% lower in blocks treated with MD-FR than not treated with MD. Further ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Attract-and-kill; Codling moth; Malus domestica; Mass trapping. |
Thesagro : |
TORTRICIDAE. |
Asunto categoría : |
H10 Plagas de las plantas |
URL : |
https://www.schweizerbart.de/content/papers/download/100304
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02909naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1063082 005 2022-04-25 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0171-8177 024 7 $a10.1127/entomologia/2021/1316$2DOI 100 1 $aKNIGHT, A. L. 245 $aCombining female removal with mating disruption for management of Cydia pomonella in apple. [Original paper].$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Manuscript received 18 February 2021; Revisions requested 2 May 2021; Modified version received 30 May 2021; Accepted 30 July 2021; Published online 4 October 2021; Published Mar 15, 2022. Corresponding author: Angeli, S.; Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy; email:sergio.angeli@unibz.it -- 520 $aABSTRACT.- Field studies tested the use of lure-baited traps for female removal (FR) of codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen, treated with sex pheromone-based mating disruption (MD-FR). Four lures were evaluated, including the combination of (E,Z)?2,4?ethyl decadienoate (pear ester, PE), (E)?4,8?dimethyl?1,3,7?nonatriene (DMNT), and 6-ethenyl-2,2,6-trimethyloxan-3-ol (pyranoid linalool oxide, LOX), these three components with (E,E)?8,10?dodecadien?1?ol (PH), and two lures loaded with PH/PE. All lures were used with a co-lure loaded with acetic acid (AA). Studies examined the importance of trap type and density on moth catches. Seventeen trials were conducted in 1-3 ha adjacent paired plots treated with or without 60 traps ha-1 in Washington State from 2018-2020. Paired plots were each treated with MD and a similar spray regime. The mating status of females in the MD-FR plots were compared with females collected from blocks not treated with MD. The PE/DMNT/LOX + AA lure caught significantly more females than any other lure. The most effective trap was a bucket trap with a green top and a clear bottom. Total or female moth catches per trap did not decline across trap densities from 37 to 99 ha-1. MD-FR trials showed that levels of fruit injury could be significantly reduced 50?75% across each moth flight. The proportion of mated females was 8 to 19% lower in blocks treated with MD-FR than not treated with MD. Further studies are needed to refine key operational factors associated with MD-FR considering the economics of organic and conventional apple production across key varieties. © 2021 The authors. 650 $aTORTRICIDAE 653 $aAttract-and-kill 653 $aCodling moth 653 $aMalus domestica 653 $aMass trapping 700 1 $aPRETI, M. 700 1 $aBASOALTO, E. 700 1 $aMUJICA, V. 700 1 $aFAVARO, R. 700 1 $aANGELI, S. 773 $tEntomologia Generalis, 2022, Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 309-321. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2021/1316
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|